Assessing the Hospitals’ Preparedness Against COVID-19: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: COVID-19 pandemic, the different mutations of virus, and emergence variants requires that hospitals upgrade their levels preparedness in managing crisis. This study aims to provide a method for assessing level hospitals’ dealing with such situations.
 Methods: In initial stage, effective criteria hospital were identified through literature review. Following that, Delphi was used obtain perspectives 40 experts from healthcare system order validate criteria. Then, SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) technique applied determine weights Through MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) technique, 10 selected Tehran assessed. Finally, using sensitivity analysis, robustness reliability proposed examined.
 Results: Results indicated personnel, education work experience, medical equipment, emergency networks critical factors determining against COVID-19. Out hospitals, Imam Khomeini Hospital found have highest preparedness.
 Conclusion: is first which recommends simple tool hybrid MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) approach. facilitates proper allocation budgets other resources strengthening handling situation
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کاملA hybrid intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for supplier selection
Due to the increasing competition of globalization, selection of the most appropriate supplier is one of the key factors for asupply chain management’s success. Due to conflicting evaluations and insufficient information about the criteria, Intuitionisticfuzzy sets (IFSs) considered as animpressive tool and utilized to specify the relative importance of the criteria. The aim of this paper is to...
متن کاملPrioritizing Rangeland Improvement Practices using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
Selecting the appropriate rangeland improvement method is a challenging task for range managers because it requires consideration of various criteria. This study was aimed to evaluate various restoration and reclamation practices in the rangelands of Semirom-Isfahan using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Grazing management, water point development, pit seeding, exclosure, water ...
متن کاملA Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Location Selection in the Niger Delta Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach
Making an informed decision with regards to a suitable business location or site selection for organizations is becoming challenging for business decision makers globally; and even more challenging in business environment that are saddled with uncertainties. The continues raise of multiple criteria variation of site preferences has also necessitated the application of advanced decision making t...
متن کاملevaluation of recommender systems: a multi-criteria decision making approach
the evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. this difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. as such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Evidence based health policy, management and economics
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2538-5070', '2538-4716']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v7i2.13140